Abstract

Erosion of sediment beneath a coastal lake by the 2011 Tohoku-oki tsunami largely removed up to 1100years of the geologic record of tsunami and tephra deposition. That lost geologic record included the 1611 Keicho tsunami deposit and the 915 To-a tephra, amounting to ca. 1.4m of lake-bottom sediment, as judged from comparison of stratigraphy at four locations examined before and after the 2011 tsunami. The tsunami replaced the eroded sediment with a 7–15-cm-thick sand sheet and an overlying 20–60-cm-thick layer of black mud. Both 2011 deposit components were likely derived from sediment eroded along the tsunami flow path, including granite rock fragments downstream of the lake basin and mainly reworked lake-floor sediment. Erosion and redeposition of lake floor sediment by tsunami inundation can introduce uncertainty to sandy tsunami deposit age estimation. The 2011 tsunami sand might be dated a few hundred years older than the actual age if one overlooks the reworked muddy tsunami deposit. In its facies, the mud closely resembles mud deposited from the usual environment but is mixed with sediments of various ages. Therefore, it is important to identify the reworked muddy tsunami deposit based on geochemistry and micropaleontology, to avoid misinterpretation of the depositional age of tsunami deposits. Erosion of deposits beneath the lake floor also erases evidence, leaving an incomplete paleo-tsunami history. Reconstructing geological records of tsunamis in coastal lakes requires careful evaluation of the possible effects of tsunami erosion. Identifying sediment sources, mapping stratigraphic unconformities, and constructing detailed age-depth models to test for gaps in sedimentation can produce important insights.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.