Abstract

AbstractThe aim of this article is to make use of recent research on ‘politicaleros’ in order to clarify the connection that Plato establishes betweenerosand tyranny inRepublicIX, specifically by elucidating the intertextuality between Plato’s work and the various historical accounts of Alcibiades. An examination of the lexicon used in these accounts will allow us to resolve certain interpretive difficulties that, to my knowledge, no other commentator has elucidated: why does Socrates blameerosfor the decline from democracy into tyranny? What does he mean by ‘eros’ here, and what link existed betweenerosand tyranny in the minds of his contemporaries? And finally, who are the mysterious ‘tyrant-makers’ (turannopoioí, 572e5-6) who, according to Socrates, introduce a destructiveerosin the soul of the future tyrant? After a careful examination of the passage from book IX on the genesis of the tyrannical man (focused on the last stage of the metamorphosis, which is concerned withéros túrannos, 572d-573b), I will offer answers to these questions by turning to the writings of Thucydides, Aristophanes and Plutarch while examining the portrait of Alcibiades that Plato paints in theAlcibiades IandSymposium.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call