Abstract

For the last 50 years, the 1951 Geneva Convention has been the core instrument in determining who deserves refugee status. However, the Convention’s notion of a well-founded fear of persecution mainly targets individuals who have been discriminated against for reasons of race, ethnicity, political opinion, religion, nationality and membership to certain social groups. The author discusses how the Convention’s definition of a refugee is not necessarily applicable to most Eritrean refugees who fled their country due to deteriorating human security and violations of fundamental human rights. This is because persecution in Eritrea is not directed against people of certain categories, but it is a silencing tool to which the whole population is subjected. The author argues that the state-sponsored systemic violations of human rights, torture, imprisonments, killings, economic deprivations and denial of opportunities, freedom and protection should warrant the granting of refugee status on a prima facie basis.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.