Abstract
Ergodicity describes an equivalence between the expectation value and the time average of observables. Applied to human behaviour, ergodic theories of decision-making reveal how individuals should tolerate risk in different environments. To optimize wealth over time, agents should adapt their utility function according to the dynamical setting they face. Linear utility is optimal for additive dynamics, whereas logarithmic utility is optimal for multiplicative dynamics. Whether humans approximate time optimal behavior across different dynamics is unknown. Here we compare the effects of additive versus multiplicative gamble dynamics on risky choice. We show that utility functions are modulated by gamble dynamics in ways not explained by prevailing decision theories. Instead, as predicted by time optimality, risk aversion increases under multiplicative dynamics, distributing close to the values that maximize the time average growth of in-game wealth. We suggest that our findings motivate a need for explicitly grounding theories of decision-making on ergodic considerations.
Highlights
Ergodicity is a foundational concept in models of physical systems that include elements of randomness[1,2]
We show that utility functions are modulated by gamble dynamics in ways not explained by prevailing decision theories
A new theory based on the thermodynamic concept of ergodicity predicts that risk preferences should be determined by the dynamical settings that people make decisions in
Summary
Ergodicity is a foundational concept in models of physical systems that include elements of randomness[1,2]. An agent might gamble on a coin toss for a gain of $1 each time they win, they might score a point each time they correctly execute a motor action, and so on. In these examples, changes in wealth are ergodic, and in such settings a linear utility function is optimal for maximising the growth of wealth over time[3,4]. For this utility function, when changes in expected utility are maximized per unit time, this maximizes the time average growth rate of wealth (Fig 1F). The time average growth rate of wealth under an additive setting is calculated as the additive change in wealth per unit time (Eq 4 in Methods), either over a finite or infinite time horizon
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
