Erection Hardness Score in Masturbation Can Serve as a Preliminary Screening Tool for Organic Erectile Dysfunction

Abstract

To explore the efficacy, in terms of sensitivity and specificity, of Erection Hardness Score (EHS) applied to masturbation in diagnosing predominantly organic erectile dysfunction (ED), compared to the actual standard, which is nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity (NPTR). A total of 189 consecutive patients who came to our outpatient clinic from October 2019 to October 2020, reporting ED and an abridged International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-6) score <26 were enrolled. Patients filled out two psychometric questionnaires: the IIEF-6 applied to partnered intercourse and the EHS applied to masturbation, then they underwent the NPTR test with Rigiscan for 2 consecutive nights in good sleep condition. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of EHS and IIEF-6 scales with NPTR as the standard, as well as the correlation between EHS, IIEF-6, and NPTR results were calculated. Results show that the sensitivity of the EHS scale for the diagnosis of ED was 60.0%, the specificity was 95.7%, the positive predictive value was 83.3%, the negative predictive value was 86.9%, and the coincidence rate was 86.2%. The correlation coefficient was 0.572 and the area under the ROC curve was 0.78, which means the strength of erection in masturbation as evaluated by the EHS can effectively help in discriminating between predominantly organic and apparently nonorganic ED. An EHS score of 3-4, meaning good-optimal erectile function during masturbation, decreases the likelihood of predominantly organic ED and reduces the need for further NPTR testing.