Abstract

Curative therapy for metastatic cancers is equivalent to causing extinction of a large, heterogeneous, and geographically dispersed population. Although eradication of dinosaurs is a dramatic example of extinction dynamics, similar application of massive eco-evolutionary force in cancer treatment is typically limited by host toxicity. Here, we investigate the evolutionary dynamics of Anthropocene species extinctions as an alternative model for curative cancer therapy. Human activities can produce extinctions of large, diverse, and geographically distributed populations. The extinction of a species typically follows a pattern in which initial demographic and ecological insults reduce the size and heterogeneity of the population. The surviving individuals, with decreased genetic diversity and often fragmented ecology, are then vulnerable to small stochastic perturbations that further reduce the population until extinction is inevitable. We hypothesize large, diverse, and disseminated cancer populations can be eradicated using similar evolutionary dynamics. Initial therapy is applied to reduce population size and diversity and followed by new treatments to exploit the eco-evolutionary vulnerability of small and/or declining populations. Mathematical models and computer simulations demonstrate initial reductive treatment followed immediately by demographic and ecological perturbations, similar to the empirically derived treatment of pediatric acute lymphocytic leukemia, can consistently achieve curative outcomes in nonpediatric cancers. SIGNIFICANCE: Anthropocene extinctions suggest a strategy for eradicating metastatic cancers in which initial therapy, by reducing the size and diversity of the population, renders it vulnerable to extinction by rapidly applied additional perturbations.

Highlights

  • The ideal outcome of cancer therapy is eradication of the malignant population without significant harm to the patient

  • We explore treatment outcomes when the second strike is applied at different time points

  • Even though the second treatment reduced the tumor population by only 20%, it proved to be effective when applied in the appropriate timeframe

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The ideal outcome of cancer therapy is eradication of the malignant population without significant harm to the patient. This is achieved in localized cancers by surgical removal or focused therapy such as radiation. A curative outcome becomes more difficult and much less likely in a metastatic setting. The growth of tumors in multiple locations requires systemic treatment. Walther and colleagues and [1] and Korolev and colleagues [2] have noted the similarities between eradicating a cancer and the extinction of natural populations. We propose that the eradication of a disseminated cancer population is analogous to “Anthropocene extinctions,” the intentional or unintentional eradication of species due to human activities

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call