Abstract

Both ERα and ERβ are expressed in not only normal breast of the rodent, cow, monkey and human, but also in breast cancer. Cells that express ERα are found within the luminal epithelium, but not in the myoepithelium or stroma in the human breast. ERβ, on the other hand, is expressed not only in the luminal epithelial cells, but also in myoepithelial cells, stromal cells and in passenger lymphocytes. This widespread distribution of ERβ suggests multiple roles for ERβ in the mammary gland. We have shown that in the rodent mammary gland ERβ is the dominant ER, and that, in response to E2, ERα but not ERβ is downregulated in the early G1 phase of the cell cycle. Cells that contain ERα receive the signal to proliferate from E2, and within 4 hours of that signal ERα is lost from the nucleus. The cells then go through a complete cycle and ERα reappears in daughter cells. ERβ levels do not change in cell nuclei during the cell cycle. This pattern of ER regulation holds true in human breast cancer since ERα is never co-localized with proliferation markers in breast cancer samples. This means that under the conditions of a constant high level of E2, ERα does not reappear in the nucleus. A similar situation exists during pregnancy when there is a constant high level of E2 and there is no ERα in the mammary epithelium. This resistance to the proliferative response to E2 in the presence of a constant high dose of E2 probably explains the very successful use of high-dose E2 in the treatment of breast cancer. ERβ, on the other hand, appears to have a differentiative role not a proliferative role in the mammary gland, and the lactating rodent mammary gland of ERβ-/- mice does not express gap junction and adhesion proteins, typical indicators of fully differentiated cells. In recent years there have been several publications showing that ERβ is expressed in human breast cancer, and conclusions and speculations about a causative role for ERβ in breast cancer development and/or progression have been made. We have studied 500 frozen breast biopsies in collaboration with Prof. RC Coombes, London, in order to clarify the role of ERβ in normal and malignant breast. In this study we measured ERα and ERβ proteins by several techniques (immunohistochemistry, western blotting, ligand binding in sucrose gradients, and RT-PCR) in various human samples obtained from both benign breast and malignant breast. We found that ERβ is the predominant estrogen receptor in the normal mammary gland and in benign breast disease. There is very little ERα in the normal mammary gland. This low expression of ERα is one of the striking differences between rodents and humans. This is in stark contrast to ERβ, which is expressed in 80% of epithelial cells and is also present in the stroma. We found that ERα is abundantly expressed in invasive and in situ ductal carcinoma but not in medullary cancer. ERβ is also expressed in breast cancer, both ductal and medullary. In this study we also found that, in the human breast, the major ER in breast stroma is ERβ. This surprising finding has necessitated several new lines of investigation about the function of ERβ in the breast. It has long been thought that ERα in the stroma was responsible for secretion of growth factors in response to E2 and that these growth factors were responsible for epithelial cell proliferation. The discovery that it is ERβ that is present in the stroma might suggest a role of ERβ in growth factor secretion.

Highlights

  • Endocrine therapy for breast cancer is a major modality for the treatment of breast cancer, producing response rates between 30% and 40% of unselected patients with the minimum of toxicity

  • We have shown that overexpression of TGF-β1 in mammary epithelial cells suppresses the development of carcinomas and that expression of a dominant negative type II TGF-β receptor (DNIIR) in mammary epithelial cells under control of the MMTV promoter/enhancer increases the incidence of erbB2 in carcinomas accompanied by Tgfbr2fspKO fibroblasts

  • We found that the frequency of the IVS10-6T>G is characterized by multiple physiologic abnormalities, including mutation was not increased in breast cancer cases as compared with neurodegeneration, immunologic abnormalities, cancer predisposition, controls

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Endocrine therapy for breast cancer is a major modality for the treatment of breast cancer, producing response rates between 30% and 40% of unselected patients with the minimum of toxicity. Several human genetic diseases are known to be or suspected to be due to defects in DNA repair or cell cycle control Some of these patients are radiation sensitive and/or predisposed for cancer as a cause of mutations in genes involved in these cellular pathways. Microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization (arrayCGH) allows the construction of high-resolution genome-wide maps of copy number alterations, and statistical software packages are available for exploring and analysing array-CGH data (see, for example, [2,3]), facilitating the delineation of the boundaries of CNAs in individual tumors and thereby localizing and identifying potential oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of gene expression-based classification as well as established prognostic markers, including mutation status of the TP53 gene, in a group of breast cancer patients with long-term (>10 years) fol The aim of this study was to compare MR spectroscopic findings from breast cancer tissue with histological grading of tumor and patient lymph node status

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call