Abstract
Evidence is presented that about 29% of the time that an electroencephalographer feels he needs to equivocate about the findings in an EEG, the clinician interprets, or at least recalls, the EEG without this equivocation. When there is a lack of recall of an equivocal report, the clinician's error is usually in the direction of considering that the record has been interpreted by the electroencephalographer as being abnormal.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
