Abstract

Equivalent frame models are an effective tool for the seismic assessment of existing masonry structures. Due to their simplicity, these models can be used to perform multiple nonlinear dynamic analyses, accounting explicitly for different sources of modeling and input uncertainty. In the past, equivalent frame models have been used to effectively estimate the global response of buildings whose behavior is dominated by in-plane failure modes of piers and spandrels. The recent development of a three-dimensional macroelement formulation for modeling both the in-plane and out-of-plane response extends the use of equivalent frame models to the additional study of local out-of-plane mechanisms of a building. This work applies the newly developed formulation, implemented in OpenSees, to the modeling of two shaking table tests on a stone masonry building and on a modern mixed concrete-unreinforced masonry structure. Since the approach explicitly accounts for the quality of connections in the building (i.e., wall-to-wall and floor-to-wall connections), specific elements and material models were developed for modeling these connections in an equivalent frame idealization of the three-dimensional structure. Through comparison with the experimental results, the performance of the modeling approach is discussed, and the sensitivity of the response to the major sources of modeling uncertainty (quality of connections, damping model) is assessed. The comparisons show that these new equivalent frame models can capture the onset of out-of-plane failure for historical structures with poor floor-to-wall connections and for modern URM buildings with stiff RC slabs, where the slab can uplift from the URM wall, which leads to changing static and kinematic boundary conditions of the out-of-plane loaded wall. The results further show that 1-2\% of damping leads to good agreements with the experimental results if initial stiffness proportional Rayleigh damping is used.

Highlights

  • The assessment of the seismic behavior of buildings through an equivalent-frame idealization is widely used, both in research and in the professional field

  • A second assumption is that the connections between the different walls of a building— provided by floor diaphragms and by the link between orthogonal walls—are sufficient to ensure that out-of-plane failure modes cannot develop before the building attains its entire in-plane capacity

  • The results of two shake table tests will be used as a comparison for the numerical models: a stone masonry aggregate of two buildings, presented in section 3, and a modern mixed reinforced concrete/masonry structure, shown in section 4, in which out-of-plane loaded walls were subjected to variable boundary conditions depending on the in-plane global behavior

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The assessment of the seismic behavior of buildings through an equivalent-frame idealization is widely used, both in research and in the professional field. The analysis concentrates on the effect of out-ofplane mass that is not rigidly lumped to orthogonal walls on the modeling of roofs and gable elements as well as on the sensitivity of the response to the assumptions related to the behavior of connections (wall-wall and wall-slab connections) and the damping To address these topics, the results of two shake table tests will be used as a comparison for the numerical models: a stone masonry aggregate of two buildings, presented, and a modern mixed reinforced concrete/masonry structure, shown, in which out-of-plane loaded walls were subjected to variable boundary conditions depending on the in-plane global behavior. Numerical simulations are compared to experimental results in terms of global quantities (floor displacements and accelerations), local deformations (displacements of out-of-plane loaded elements, slip between wall and floors), and distribution of damage and drifts in the walls of the building

MODEL FORMULATION AND
Macroelement Formulation
Orthotropic Membrane Elements
Nonlinear Floor-To-Wall Connections
Wall-To-Wall Connections
STONE MASONRY BUILDING
Model Calibration
Sensitivity Analysis
Time-History Response
Findings
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call