Abstract
In the current AASHTO LRFD specifications, the fatigue design considers only one design truck per bridge with 15% dynamic allowance. While this empirical approach may be practical for regular short and medium span bridges, it may not be rational for long-span bridges (e.g., span length >152.4m or 500ft) that may carry many heavy trucks simultaneously. Some existent studies suggested that fatigue may not control the design for many small and medium bridges. However, little research on the fatigue performance of long-span bridges subjected to both wind and traffic has been reported and if fatigue could become a dominant issue for such a long-span bridge design is still not clear. Regardless if the current fatigue design specifications are sufficient or not, a real understanding of the traffic effects on bridge performance including fatigue is desirable since the one truck per bridge for fatigue design does not represent the actual traffic condition. As the first step toward the study of fatigue performance of long-span cable-stayed bridges under both busy traffic and wind, the equivalent dynamic wheel load approach is proposed in the current study to simplify the analysis procedure. Based on full interaction analyses of a single-vehicle–bridge–wind system, the dynamic wheel load of the vehicle acting on the bridge can be obtained for a given vehicle type, wind, and driving condition. As a result, the dimension of the coupled equations is independent of the number of vehicles, through which the analyses can be significantly simplified. Such simplification is the key step toward the future fatigue analysis of long-span bridges under a combined action of wind and actual traffic conditions.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.