Abstract

Background: Wixela® Inhub® was developed to deliver inhaled fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FP/S) combination as a substitutable generic equivalent to Advair® Diskus®. These studies aimed to confirm the pharmacokinetic bioequivalence (BE) of FP/S after single doses of Wixela Inhub (test [T]) and Advair Diskus (reference [R]).Methods: Three open-label, randomized, two-way crossover, single-dose studies in healthy subjects (N = 66 each) compared the systemic exposure of FP and salmeterol after inhalation from three dose strengths of FP/S (100/50, 250/50, or 500/50 μg) delivered from T and R. Primary BE endpoints were the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time = 0 to the last measurable concentration (AUC(0-t)) and the maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) for both FP and S. The BE acceptance criteria specified that the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean T/R ratios for AUC(0-t) and Cmax can be contained within 0.80–1.25 for both FP and salmeterol.Results: Wixela Inhub met the acceptance criteria for BE for FP and salmeterol at each dose strength. Estimated AUC(0-t) and Cmax geometric mean ratios (T/R [90% CI]) for FP were, respectively, 1.04 (1.00–1.08) and 0.92 (0.87–0.96) for 100/50 μg FP/S, 1.07 (1.02–1.13) and 1.01 (0.95–1.07) for 250/50 μg, and 0.97 (0.92, 1.00) and 0.90 (0.86–0.93) for 500/50 μg. Estimated AUC(0-t) and Cmax ratios for salmeterol were, respectively, 1.08 (1.04–1.11) and 1.00 (0.94–1.04) for 100/50 μg FP/S, 1.03 (0.99–1.07) and 0.93 (0.87–1.00) for 250/50 μg, and 1.00 (0.96–1.04) and 0.86 (0.81–0.91) for 500/50 μg. FP/S at all doses via both T and R was comparably well tolerated.Conclusions: Wixela Inhub was bioequivalent to Advair Diskus at all three dose strengths for both FP and S, providing direct evidence of equivalent systemic safety and indirect evidence for equivalent pulmonary deposition.

Highlights

  • Acombination of oral inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting b2-adrenergic agonists (LABAs) is recommended for patients with asthma not controlled with ICS alone and for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) at high risk of exacerbations.[1,2,3,4]Fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FP/S) dry powder inhaler is a widely prescribed ICS/LABA fixed-dose combination drug, marketed in the United States as AdvairÒ DiskusÒ (GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC)

  • Wixela Inhub is being developed as a generic equivalent to Advair Diskus

  • For the FP/S 100/50 lg, 250/50 lg, and 500/50 lg dose strengths, BE criteria were fully met for both FP and salmeterol for each primary endpoint (AUC(0-t) and Cmax), in accordance with regulatory guidance.[11]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Acombination of oral inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting b2-adrenergic agonists (LABAs) is recommended for patients with asthma not controlled with ICS alone and for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) at high risk of exacerbations.[1,2,3,4]Fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FP/S) dry powder inhaler is a widely prescribed ICS/LABA fixed-dose combination drug, marketed in the United States as AdvairÒ DiskusÒ (GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC). The objective of each study was to confirm the systemic PK BE of FP and salmeterol after oral inhalation of single doses of Wixela Inhub and Advair Diskus. WixelaÒ InhubÒ was developed to deliver inhaled fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FP/S) combination as a substitutable generic equivalent to AdvairÒ DiskusÒ. These studies aimed to confirm the pharmacokinetic bioequivalence (BE) of FP/S after single doses of Wixela Inhub (test [T]) and Advair Diskus (reference [R]). Methods: Three open-label, randomized, two-way crossover, single-dose studies in healthy subjects (N 1⁄4 66 each) compared the systemic exposure of FP and salmeterol after inhalation from three dose strengths of FP/S (100/50, 250/50, or 500/50 lg) delivered from T and R. Conclusions: Wixela Inhub was bioequivalent to Advair Diskus at all three dose strengths for both FP and S, providing direct evidence of equivalent systemic safety and indirect evidence for equivalent pulmonary deposition

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call