Abstract

The “Attentional Blink” refers to difficulty in detecting the second of two target stimuli presented in rapid temporal succession. Studies have shown that salient target stimuli, such as one’s own name, reduce the magnitude of this effect. Given indications that self-related processing is altered in autism, it is an open question whether this attentional self-bias is reduced in autism. To investigate this, in the current study we utilised an Attentional Blink paradigm involving one’s own and others’ names, in a group of 24 autistic adults, and 22 neurotypical adults, while measuring EEG. In line with previous studies, the Attentional Blink was reduced when the participant’s own name was the second target, with no differences between autistic and neurotypical participants. ERP results show that the effect on the Attentional Blink of one’s own name was reflected in increased N2 and P3 amplitudes, for both autistic and nonautistic individuals. This is the first event-related potential study of own-name processing in the context of the Attentional Blink. The results provide evidence of an intact attentional self-bias in autism, both at the behavioural and neural level.

Highlights

  • Humans are biased to process preferentially any information that is relevant to ourselves

  • We investigated attenuation of the Attentional Blink when one’s own name is presented as the second target, comparing this effect between a group of adults with autism and a group of neurotypical adults

  • To the best of our knowledge, this is both the first eventrelated potentials (ERPs) study of the Attentional Blink in autism, and of the Attentional Blink where names are presented as targets

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Humans are biased to process preferentially any information that is relevant to ourselves. Previous research demonstrates that preferential processing of self-related stimuli occurs across various cognitive domains, including memory, perception, and attention ( Cunningham & Turk, 2017). This “self-” or “egocentric” bias is present for stimuli that have long been associated with the self, such as one’s own face or name (Bortolon & Raffard, 2018; Wood & Cowan, 1995; Yang et al, 2013), and for newly self-associated stimuli, such as objects, geometric shapes, and trait adjectives (Cunningham et al, 2008; Sui et al, 2012; Symons & Johnson, 1997). Such simulations allow one to determine which emotions, mental, or other internal states would be experienced if one was in the other’s state and, in turn, these are attributed to the other (Goldman, 2006)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call