Abstract
We aimed to compare cardioprotection induced by various hypoxic preconditioning (HPC) and ischemic preconditioning (IPC) protocols. Isolated rat hearts were randomly divided into 7 groups (n = 7 per group) and received 3 or 5 cycles of 3-minute ischemia or hypoxia followed by 3-minute reperfusion (IPC33 or HPC33 or IPC53 or HPC53 group), 3 cycles of 5-minute ischemia or hypoxia followed by 5-minute reperfusion (IPC35 group or HPC35 group), or 30-minute perfusion (ischemic/reperfusion group), respectively. Then all the hearts were subjected to 50-minute ischemia and 120-minute reperfusion. Cardiac function, infarct size, and coronary flow rate (CFR) were evaluated. Recovery of cardiac function and CFR in IPC35, HPC35, and HPC53 groups was significantly improved as compared with I/R group (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences in cardiac function parameters between IPC35 and HPC35 groups. Consistently, infarct size was significantly reduced in IPC35, HPC35, and HPC53 groups compared with ischemic/reperfusion group. Multiple-cycle short duration HPC exerted cardioprotection, which was as powerful as that of IPC.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
