Abstract
Psychologists must be able to test both for the presence of an effect and for the absence of an effect. In addition to testing against zero, researchers can use the two one-sided tests (TOST) procedure to test for equivalence and reject the presence of a smallest effect size of interest (SESOI). The TOST procedure can be used to determine if an observed effect is surprisingly small, given that a true effect at least as extreme as the SESOI exists. We explain a range of approaches to determine the SESOI in psychological science and provide detailed examples of how equivalence tests should be performed and reported. Equivalence tests are an important extension of the statistical tools psychologists currently use and enable researchers to falsify predictions about the presence, and declare the absence, of meaningful effects.
Highlights
Psychologists must be able to test both for the presence of an effect and for the absence of an effect
Equivalence testing is a simple statistical technique for determining whether one should reject the presence of an effect at least as extreme as the smallest effect size of interest (SESOI)
The result of an equivalence test can be obtained by mere visual inspection of the confidence interval (Seaman & Serlin, 1998; Tryon, 2001) or by performing two one-sided tests
Summary
Psychologists must be able to test both for the presence of an effect and for the absence of an effect. The researcher can perform an equivalence test to examine whether the gender difference in application rates is at least as extreme as the smallest effect size of interest (SESOI).
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
