Abstract

BackgroundThe literature reports that the use of healthcare services in urban areas compared to rural areas and by females compared to males is often higher. The aim of this study is to evaluate equity on geographical living area and gender for the use of primary and secondary healthcare in Suriname.MethodsWe used 5,671 records (99%) from the Suriname Health study which was designed according to World Health Organization (WHO) Steps guidelines. We evaluated the Prevalence Ratio (PR) for living area and gender in using primary (PHC) and secondary healthcare (SHC) adjusted for the perceived need for healthcare, socio-economic factors and disease factors and the effect of all factors was measured.ResultsOverall a percentage of 46.7 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 45.1–48.4) had used primary healthcare and 12.7 (95% CI 11.6–13.8) secondary healthcare in the past 12 months. The PR for males compared to females was 0.75 (95% CI 0.70–0.81) for primary healthcare and 0.82 (95% CI 0.69–0.98) for secondary healthcare. The PR for urban and rural coastal areas compared to the rural interior was 1.52 (95 % CI 1.36–1.70) and 1.53 (95% CI 1.36–1.71), respectively. For the use of SHC, the PR for urban and rural coastal areas compared to the rural interior was 9.3 (95 % CI 5.44–15.89) and 8.58 (95% CI 4.98–14.81). The attributable effect of perceived healthcare-need to the PR of the urban and rural coastal areas was 39.64% and 37.81% compared to the rural interior for secondary healthcare. Further, 31.74% and 13.56% were due to socioeconomic factors.ConclusionAlthough we observed equity between living areas for PHC use, for SHC use we observed a disadvantaged position for the rural interior, mainly influenced by socioeconomic factors. We measured gender equity for both PHC and SHC use.

Highlights

  • Equity in health, defined as the absence of avoidable or remediable differences among groups of people [1], is considered a major public health issue in developed [2,3] as well as in developing countries [4,5]

  • The Prevalence Ratio (PR) for urban and rural coastal areas compared to the rural interior was 1.52 and 1.53, respectively

  • For the use of secondary healthcare (SHC), the PR for urban and rural coastal areas compared to the rural interior was 9.3 and 8.58

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Equity in health, defined as the absence of avoidable or remediable differences among groups of people [1], is considered a major public health issue in developed [2,3] as well as in developing countries [4,5] It challenges healthcare systems and policy makers to ensure optimal access to healthcare and to address causes of disadvantages. We evaluated the Prevalence Ratio (PR) for living area and gender in using primary (PHC) and secondary healthcare (SHC) adjusted for the perceived need for healthcare, socio-economic factors and disease factors and the effect of all factors was measured. The attributable effect of perceived healthcare-need to the PR of the urban and rural coastal areas was 39.64% and 37.81% compared to the rural interior for secondary healthcare. We measured gender equity for both PHC and SHC use

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call