Abstract

Fees charged by U.S. equity exchanges for services such as non-core market data, connectivity, and co-location have become controversial. Recently, the Securities and Exchange Commission required the exchanges justify hundreds of past fee increases. In their defense, exchanges argue that the fees that they charge are constrained by competition for order flow between the three major exchange families. To the authors’ knowledge, no extant work associates fee changes with exchange revenues. We gather fee increases and exchange financial statement information between 2006 and 2016 to examine the relation between fees and revenues. We find that, when statistically significant, revenue increases with fee increases without a consistently strong volume effect, which suggests that any decrease in subscriptions due to fee increases is more than offset by the revenue increase from the remaining subscribers.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.