Abstract

This article argues that a truly democratic society must adhere to a principle of equitable sharing, meaning that all the benefits and detriments of social life must be distributed in an equitable manner among all members of society. The argument derives from an examination of John Locke’s libertarianism, John Mill’s utilitarianism, and John Rawls’ egalitarianism, all of which contain forms of equitable sharing of which aspects appear in the philosophical underpinnings and historical development of this society. Related articles argue that plausible readings of the society’s founding documents, the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, support a requirement of equitable sharing, and that the Supreme Court has a viable and legitimate role to play in implementing equitable sharing.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call