Abstract

Simple SummaryWe aimed to determine whether seasonal brood sex-ratio, sex-biased chick survival, and sex specific dimorphism at hatching or during growth occurs among three species of resident Australian shorebird. Our results describe no sex-bias in chick production, survival or growth rates between sexes for any of the three species studied. Sex-biases in populations can have important implications for species’ social biology, population demography and mating systems. It has recently been suggested that in some shorebirds, sex-specific bias in survival of precocial young may occur. This may be driven by variation in the brood sex-ratio and/or the sexual size dimorphism of young birds, which may influence predator escape capacity. Understanding the survival of young birds remains a significant knowledge gap for many taxa, especially when young birds are mobile and cryptic. Our aims were to estimate the sex-ratio variation in three species of Australian resident shorebird, specifically to determine: (1) whether seasonal brood sex-ratio variation at hatching is occurring, (2) the extent of any sex-biased chick survival, (3) if sex specific dimorphism at hatching or during growth occurs; and, (4) whether escape capacity differs between the sexes. We radio-tracked 50 Masked Lapwing Vanellus miles, 42 Red-capped Plover Charadrius ruficapillus and 27 Hooded Plover Thinornis cucullatus chicks from individual broods, examined the likelihood of hatchlings being male or female based on the hatching date within the breeding season, and compared size at hatching, growth and mortality of chicks of different sexes. There was no sex-bias with the hatching date across the breeding season, nor were there differences in survival or growth rates between sexes for any of the three species studied. In one species, male hatchlings had longer tarsi than females, but this did not result in differential escape propensity or improved survival. In conclusion, the hatching date, survival and growth of chicks from three species of resident shorebird was not influenced by their sex.

Highlights

  • Offspring sex-ratios of many animal species are parous as parents invest in the sexes [1,2].In other species females may exhibit skewed brood sex-ratios to maximise their future reproductive potential [3,4]

  • We examine whether: (1) seasonal hatchling sex-ratio variation, (2) sex-biased chick survival; and, (3) sexual dimorphism in size at hatching or growth rates occurs among three species of resident shorebirds (Masked Lapwing Vanellus miles, Red-capped Plover Charadrius ruficapillus and the Vulnerable Hooded Plover Thinornis cucullatus)

  • The equitable survival to fledging between the sexes which we describe may help explain the parous adult sex-ratio of the Red-capped Plover study population (0.546; Lees et al unpublished data; the only species studied for which adult sex ratio is readily attainable)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Offspring sex-ratios of many animal species are parous as parents invest in the sexes [1,2]. In other species females may exhibit skewed brood sex-ratios to maximise their future reproductive potential [3,4]. Future reproductive value of each sex of young may be influenced by: parental traits (e.g., male attractiveness or female condition), environmental characteristics, and the age of first breeding or juvenile survival [4]. Correlations between future reproductive value and maternal sex-ratio adjustment are well documented [6,7,8,9,10], including numerous studies demonstrating variation in the sex-ratio of young produced at hatching across the breeding season. Many key studies have focussed on birds: Whiskered Tern Chlidonias hybrid [11], Lesser

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call