Abstract

Fe–Ti–P-rich mafic to intermediate rocks (monzodiorites and oxide–apatite–gabbronorites, OAGNs) are found as small intrusions in most AMCG (anorthosite–magnerite–charnokite–granite) suites. The origin of the monzodioritic rocks is still debated, but in many studies, they are presumed to represent residual liquid compositions after fractionation of anorthositic cumulates. In the 1.64 Ga Ahvenisto complex, SE Finland, monzodioritic rocks occur as minor dike-like lenses closely associated with anorthositic rocks. We report new field, petrographic, and geochemical (XRF, ICP-MS, EMPA) data complemented with crystallization modeling (rhyolite-MELTS, MAGFRAC) for the monzodioritic rocks, apatite–oxide–gabbronorite, and olivine-bearing anorthositic rocks of the Ahvenisto complex. The presented evidence suggest that the monzodioritic rocks closely represent melt compositions while the apatite–oxide–gabbronorite and olivine-bearing anorthositic rocks are cumulates. The monzodioritic rocks seem to form a liquid line of descent (LLD) from primitive olivine monzodiorites to more evolved monzodiorites. Petrological modeling suggests that the interpreted LLD closely corresponds to a residual melt trend left after fractional crystallization (FC) and formation of the cumulate anorthositic rocks and minor apatite–oxide–gabbronorite in shallow magma chambers. Consequent equilibrium crystallization (EC) of separate monzodioritic residual magma batches can produce the observed mineral assemblages and the low Mg numbers measured from olivine (Fo25–45) and pyroxenes (En48–63, Mg#cpx 60–69). The monzodioritic rocks and apatite–oxide–gabbronorites show similar petrological and geochemical characteristics to corresponding rock types in other AMCG suites, and the model described in this study could be applicable to them as well.

Highlights

  • Despite decades of study of the parental magma compositions, tectonic setting, and temporal constraints of the Proterozoic massif-type anorthosites and related rock types, a Communicated by Mark S

  • We tentatively suggest, based on our observations, that the most suitable global mode of origin for the monzodioritic rocks is that they represent residual melt compositions after anorthosite fractionation and that with some modification the fractional crystallization models outlined in this study could be applied to other associated with mangerite–charnokite–granite (AMCG) suites as well

  • The monzodioritic rocks and apatite–oxide–gabbronorite in the Ahvenisto AMCG complex, southeastern Finland, represent residual compositions left after fractional crystallization and formation of the anorthositic cumulate rocks

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Despite decades of study of the parental magma compositions, tectonic setting, and temporal constraints of the Proterozoic massif-type anorthosites and related rock types, a Communicated by Mark S. Based on the IUGS classification (Le Maitre et al 2002), in this study we prefer the use of monzodiorite for the rocks in group 2

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call