Abstract

Abstract The observed standard free energy change (ΔG0obs) for the ATP-pyrophosphorylase reaction (EC 3.6.1.8) has been calculated for near physiological conditions of temperature, ionic strength, and free magnesium concentration. The observed equilibrium constant (Kobs) for the acetyl-CoA synthetase reaction (EC 6.2.1.1) has been determined at both 25 and 38°, pH 7.0, ionic strength 0.25, and varying free [Mg2+]. The Kobs of this reaction reflects the difference between the ΔG0obs for the hydrolysis of acetyl-CoA and the ΔG0obs for the hydrolysis of ATP to AMP and inorganic PPi. Using Σ and square brackets to indicate total concentrations of all the ionic species present: [see PDF for equation] The observed value of this constant varies with the free [Mg2+] being 10.7 (38°) and 15.1 (25°) at free [Mg2+] = 0; 9.17 (38°) and 12.9 (25°) at free [Mg2+] = 10-4 m, and 9.88 (38°) and 11.4 (25°) at free [Mg2+] = 10-3 m. The values of ΔH0obs for this reaction are also a function of the free [Mg2+], being 4.9 Cal per mole (20.5 kJ per mole) at free [Mg2+] = 0; 4.8 Cal per mole (20.0 kJ per mole) at free [Mg2+] = 10-4 m; and 3.6 Cal per mole (15.3 kJ per mole) at free [Mg2+] = 10-3 m. The ΔG0obs for the hydrolysis of acetyl-CoA is virtually unaffected by the free [Mg2+] and has been previously determined to be -8.54 Cal per mole (-35.75 kJ per mole) under the same conditions of temperature, pH, and ionic strength. Therefore, at 38°, pH 7.0, ionic strength 0.25, and taking the standard state of liquid water to have unit activity ([H2O] = 1), the ΔG0obs for the reaction [see PDF for equation] can be calculated at 38° and ionic strength of 0.25 to be -10.0 Cal per mole (-41.84 kJ per mole) at free [Mg2+] = 0; -9.91 Cal per mole (-41.46 kJ per mole) at free [Mg2+] = 10-4 m; and -9.96 Cal per mole (-41.67 kJ per mole) at free [Mg2+] = 10-3 m. The corresponding equilibrium constants for the hydrolysis of ATP to AMP and inorganic pyrophosphate under these conditions are 10.8 x 106 m ([Mg2+] = 0), 9.26 x 106 m (free [Mg2+] = 10-4 m), and 9.98 x 106 m (free [Mg2+] = 10-3 m).

Highlights

  • The AGzbsfor the hydrolysis of acetyl-CoA is virtually unaffected by the free [Mg2f] and has been previously determined to be -8.54 Cal per mole (-35.75 kJ per mole) under the same conditions of temperature, pH, and ionic strength

  • The current study reports the determination of the AGzba for another fundamental reaction, the hydrolysis of the ATP to AMP and PPi

  • Using x and square brackets to indicate total concentration, for the hydrolysis of the inner pyrophosphate bond of ATP, &bs = [x AMP1 Lx PPil/[E ATP] [Hz01 *. Essential to these calculations is an accurate estimate of the equilibrium constant of the acetyl-CoA synthetase reaction

Read more

Summary

SUMMARY

The observed standard free energy change (AGtbs) for the ATP-pyrophosphorylase reaction (EC 3.6.1.8) has been calculated for near physjological conditions of temperature, ionic strength, and free magnesium concentration. The observed equilibrium constant (Kobs)for the acetyl-CoA synthetase reaction (EC 6.2.1.1) has been determined at both 25 and 38”, pH 7.0, ionic strength 0.25, and varying free [Mg’+]. The Kobs of this reaction reflects the difference between the AGtbS for the hydrolysis of acetyl-CoA and the AGO,,I,*for the hydrolysis of ATP to AMP and inorganic PPi. Using c and square brackets to indicate total concentrations of all the ionic speciespresent:. In previous studies the observed standard free energy change (AGfb,)l for the hydrolysis of acetyl-CoA [1] and the hydrolysis of ATP to ADP and Pi [2] have been determined under physiological conditions. Using x and square brackets to indicate total concentration, for the hydrolysis of the inner pyrophosphate bond of ATP, &bs = [x AMP1 Lx PPil/[E ATP] [Hz01 * Essential to these calculations is an accurate estimate of the equilibrium constant of the acetyl-CoA synthetase reaction. The value of the equilibrium constant for the acetyl-CoA synthetase reaction determined in the current study differs significantly from either of the previous determinations [5, 6]

PROCEDURE
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Enthalpy changes were calculated using the familiar van’t

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.