Abstract
Minister of Home Affairs v Fourie 2006 3 BCLR 355 (CC) is, from a legal and constitutional perspective, relatively uncomplicated and the conclusion almost inevitable, given the explicit terms of the Constitution. However, the directive to Parliament to regulate gay and lesbian unions in a manner consistent with dignity, caused a national outcry. South Africans were confronted with having to take rightsseriously. This article assesses the major legal changes wrought through the right to equality and human dignity and argues that the reasoning, conclusion and consequences of the Fourie judgment was positive for the country as it taught important lessons about the supremacy of the Constitution, the constraints upon majoritarianism, respect for those differently situated and the consequences of taking rights seriously.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.