Abstract
Abstract Recent proposals for constitutional settlement of the Northern Ireland conflict have converged around the principles of equality, pluralism and democracy. The central philosophical problem is how to interpret and apply these principles. This article studies six settlement proposals from the New Ireland Forum Report of May 1984 to the Downing Street Declaration of December 1993. It argues that neither unionist integrationist nor regionalist proposals meet pluralist egalitarian principles on the constitutional issue. It identifies three approaches which meet these criteria. One, embodied in the Anglo‐Irish Agreement and in one reading of the Downing Street Declaration takes equality to mean equal opportunity to have majority choice implemented, democracy to involve majority voting and pluralism to involve an undefined accommodation between the traditions. Another, embodied in a proposal for shared authority, argues for equality in the national character and cultural substance of the state, democrac...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.