Abstract

Fundamental legal principles may function as a check on legislative power protecting citizens against arbitrary interferences with their liberty. This contribution deals with the principle of equality and the principle of certainty. First, the testing of legislation against the principle of equality is presented as a case study of constitutional review. In the Netherlands, the constitutional dialogue between the legislator and the Dutch Supreme Court revolving around the principle of equality demonstrates a fair amount of subtle details. As a result, constitutional review can hardly be called an all or nothing affair. Secondly, retroactive tax legislation is dealt with. The legislator does seem to take the principle of legal certainty, another fundamental legal principle, quite seriously, although no testing of statutory legislation is possible by the courts. With regard to retroactive tax legislation the Government has committed itself in a memorandum, requested by Parliament, to adhere to rules of conduct with regard to different situations where it deems retroactive tax legislation to be justified. Thus, a soft law instrument facilitates a dialogue between different partners in the business of law-making.

Highlights

  • As the German lawyer and legal philosopher Gustav Radbruch argued, legal certainty is definitely one of the most fundamental legal values.[118]

  • The Dutch Supreme Court always employs this method to decide whether a tax statute violates the principle of equality, which is in conformity with the method applied by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR).[76]

  • 116 The Supreme Court judges possibly fear that the political background of new candidates for the Supreme Court will become more important at the cost of their legal expertise

Read more

Summary

Introduction

As the German lawyer and legal philosopher Gustav Radbruch argued, legal certainty is definitely one of the most fundamental legal values.[118]. The well-known desiderata formulated by Lon Fuller spring to mind These eight conditions are ‘the sort ideals which articulate the law in the rule of law.’[121] These desiderata, embodying the ‘inner morality of law’, may serve as a handle to operationalize the value of legal certainty. As Fuller points out, there is a close affinity between the harm resulting from too frequent changes in the law and the harm done by retroactive legislation. Both are caused by legislative inconstancy.[126]

Fundamental protection of individual liberties and rights
The legislative process in actual practice
Fundamental legal principles and the testing of tax legislation
The principle of equality: the method of judicial interpretation
A wide margin of appreciation for the tax legislator
Fundamental rights and technical distinctions
More judicial deference: a terme de grâce
Retroactive tax legislation
Findings
10. Summary
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.