Abstract
Malnutrition and muscle mass loss are complications in liver cirrhosis and alcoholic hepatitis (AH). Hospitalised patients who do not meet nutritional requirements are recommended to be fed enterally or parenterally, but no guidelines recommend a specific type of tube. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of jejunal versus gastric feeding. 40 inpatients with liver cirrhosis and/or AH, a nutritional risk score more than 2 and a reduced daily energy intake were included. Half were randomised to nasogastric (NG) and half to nasojejunal (NJ) tube feeding. All received Peptamen AF as a supplement to oral intake. Participants were followed up until discharge or death. The study evaluated the data for 33 patients for 7 days after tube insertion. Mean daily energy intake for 7 days was 6509 kJ (NG) vs 6605kJ (NJ) (P=0.90). Tubes accidently removed by patients: once (n=16); twice (n=9); three times (n=6), with no differences between NG and NJ. There were no significant differences in total nutritional intake between early NG feeding and early NJ feeding 7 days after tube insertion. The number of tube replacements was similar in both groups. Choice of tubes for patients with severe liver disease will depend on individual patient characteristics and needs and local facilities.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
