Abstract

BackgroundOesophageal (OeC) and gastric (GC) cancer patients are treated with similar multimodal therapy and have poor survival. There remains an urgent clinical need to identify biomarkers to individualise patient management and improve outcomes. Therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors has shown promising results in other cancers. Proposed biomarkers to predict potential response to immune checkpoint inhibitors include DNA mismatch repair (MMR) and/or Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) status. The aim of this study was to establish and compare EBV status and MMR status in large multi-centre series of OeC and GC. MethodsEBV was assessed by EBV-encoded RNA (EBER) in situ hybridisation and MMR protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in 988 OeC and 1213 GC from multiple centres. In a subset of OeC, microsatellite instability (MSI) was tested in parallel with MMR IHC. ResultsFrequency of MMR deficiency (MMRdef) and MSI was low in OeC (0.8% and 0.6%, respectively) compared with GC (10.3%). None of the OeCs were EBER positive in contrast to 4.8% EBER positive GC. EBV positive GC patients were younger (p = 0.01), more often male (p = 0.001) and had a better overall survival (p = 0.012). MMRdef GC patients were older (p = 0.001) and showed more often intestinal-type histology (p = 0.022). ConclusionsThis is the largest study to date indicating that EBV and MMRdef do not play a role in OeC carcinogenesis in contrast to GC. The potential clinical usefulness of determining MMRdef/EBV status to screen patients for eligibility for immune-targeting therapy differs between OeC and GC patients.

Highlights

  • Oesophageal cancer (OeC) and gastric cancer (GC) are the eighth and fifth most common cancer worldwide, respectively, with an estimated total of 1,407,000 new cases and 1,123,000 deaths in 2012 [1]

  • EpsteineBarr virus (EBV) RNA in situ hybridisation EBV data from a previous study were available for 437 Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (LTHT) and 216 Kanagawa Cancer Center Hospital (KCCH) GC [28]

  • EBV status was determined on tissue microarray (TMA) in the LTHT (OeC and GC), oesophageal cancer trial 02 [25] (Oe02) and KCCH cohorts by EBV-encoded RNA (EBER) in situ hybridisation as previously described [29]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Oesophageal cancer (OeC) and gastric cancer (GC) are the eighth and fifth most common cancer worldwide, respectively, with an estimated total of 1,407,000 new cases and 1,123,000 deaths in 2012 [1]. The two main histological OeC subtypes are squamous cell carcinoma (SqC) and adenocarcinoma (AdC). GC patients receive perioperative platinum/ fluorouracil based chemotherapy. For OeC, patients with SqC are treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy with carboplatin/paclitaxel. Patients with AdC receive perioperative platinum/fluorouracil or preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Oesophageal (OeC) and gastric (GC) cancer patients are treated with similar multimodal therapy and have poor survival. There remains an urgent clinical need to identify biomarkers to individualise patient management and improve outcomes. Therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors has shown promising results in other cancers. Proposed biomarkers to predict potential response to immune checkpoint inhibitors include DNA mismatch repair (MMR) and/or EpsteineBarr virus (EBV) status.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call