Abstract
Almost all representations of phosphates [(RO)3PO], trialkyl phosphine oxides (R3PO) and related species include a double bond between phosphorus and oxygen. However, we strongly oppose the double-bond representation and maintain that it is misleading. EPR evidence for electron-loss centres are shown to be in accord with the structures (R)3+P—O˙, with small, negative spin density on phosphorus. Also, electron addition shows that there are no low-lying vacant 3d orbitals available for the excess electrons, which occupy a largely non-bonding σ orbital with high spin-density in the 3s orbital on phosphorus. These results cannot be reconciled with any of the concepts which lead to the PO formulation.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
