Abstract
This review essay takes Kenneth Warren’s What Was African American Literature? as an opportunity to reflect on the theory of history operative in literary studies. I suggest that Warren employs the idea that history is defined by shifting epochal units determined by legal structures. Building on the recent work of critical theorist Gabriel Rockhill, I propose that we should instead understand all histories as partial histories of the various strata that make up the present. Such a conception of history can more adequately handle the complexity of the relations between literature, race, and class today. The essay thus proposes that we can resituate Warren’s book alongside the strong responses it has elicited as a series of partial histories that can profitably speak to each other. In this way I hope to show the valuable insights that both Warren and his critics provide, while reframing the debate around the background question of the concept of history in literary studies.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.