Abstract

The identification of disease-specific autoantibodies to the 65-kDa isoform of glutamate decarboxylase (GAD65Ab) epitopes in type 1 diabetes has been hampered by their conformational nature. Here, we compared two methods of GAD65Ab epitope analysis: GAD65/67 fusion proteins and competition assays using GAD65-specific recombinant fraction antigen binding (rFab). Sera from newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes patients ( n=61) were studied using both approaches. Competition of GAD65 binding by an rFab to a specific epitope did not correlate with binding to the fusion protein that represented this epitope. Conversely, samples that bound to specific fusion proteins were not necessarily competed with rFab specific to determinants in the same region. We conclude that epitopes of different characteristics are detected by fusion proteins and by competition with rFab. Fusion proteins allow the definition of large epitope regions; however, some conformational GAD65Ab epitopes, especially those residing in the middle region, are destroyed or distorted in the fusion proteins. Competition studies using rFab allow the identification of conformational epitopes. However, monoclonal rFab may only reflect a limited proportion of the epitopes recognized by polyclonal sera. A combined analysis using both approaches may therefore be necessary to gain best understanding of autoantibody characteristics and affinity maturation.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.