Abstract

AbstractGrain boundaries (GBs) are ubiquitous in solids. Their description is critical for understanding polycrystalline materials and explaining their mechanical and electrical properties. A GB in a 2D material can be described as a line defect and its atomic structures have been intensively studied in materials such as graphene. These GBs accommodate the relative rotation of two neighboring grains by incorporating periodic units consisting of nonhexagonal rings along the boundary. Zero‐degree GBs, called domain boundaries (DBs), where there is only a lattice offset between two grains without any rotation, are rare in 2D van‐der‐Waals (vdW) bonded materials where the grains can easily move. However, this movement is not possible in 2D materials that have a strong epitaxial relationship with their substrate such as the M2O3 (2 × 2) honeycomb monolayers on noble metal (111) supports. Involving experimental and theoretical investigations, four main DBs are observed here in a monolayer of Ti2O3 supported on Au(111) and their atomic structures are solved. The DB formation energies explain why some DBs are more frequently observed than others. The strong epitaxial constraint from the Au(111) substrate stabilizes some unique Ti2O3 monolayer DB structures that are not observed in vdW‐bonded 2D materials.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.