Abstract

The complex societal challenges of the twenty-first Century require scientific researchers and academically educated professionals capable of conducting scientific research in complex problem contexts. Our central claim is that educational approaches inspired by a traditional empiricist epistemology insufficiently foster the required deep conceptual understanding and higher-order thinking skills necessary for epistemic tasks in scientific research. Conversely, we argue that constructivist epistemologies (developed in the philosophy of science in practice) provide better guidance to educational approaches to promote research skills. We also argue that teachers adopting a constructivist learning theory do not necessarily embrace a constructivist epistemology. On the contrary, in educational practice, novel educational approaches that adopt constructivist learning theories (e.g., project-based learning, PjBL) often maintain traditional empiricist epistemologies. Philosophers of science can help develop educational designs focused on learning to conduct scientific research, combining constructivist learning theory with constructivist epistemology. We illustrate this by an example from a bachelor’s program in Biomedical Engineering, where we introduce conceptual models and modeling as an alternative to the traditional focus on hypothesis testing in conducting scientific research. This educational approach includes the so-called B&K method for (re-)constructing scientific models to scaffold teaching and learning conceptual modeling.

Highlights

  • Contemporary undergraduate and graduate programs aim to educate students to become researchers and professionals capable of conducting practice-oriented scientific research

  • Teachers often claim that students lack a critical and investigative attitude towards scientific research (Ahern et al, 2019). These findings suggest that the current project-based learning (PjBL) approaches do not substantially contribute to the achievement of intended learning outcomes (ILOs) required for scientific research in complex problem-solving

  • Concerning the limitations in developing deep conceptual understanding and higher-order thinking skills through project-based learning (PjBL) observed by teachers and reported in the educational literature, we have aimed to demonstrate that fundamental philosophical issues are at stake regarding the commonly used vocabularies (1) to think about education in scientific research, and (2) to talk about scientific research

Read more

Summary

16 Page 2 of 23

Keywords Scientific research practices . Philosophy of science in practice . Constructivist epistemologies . Constructivist learning-theories . Conceptual modeling . Higher-order thinking skills . Scientific thinking . Educational sciences . Epistemic tools

Introduction
Constructivist epistemology
16 Page 4 of 23
Twenty-first-century professionals
16 Page 6 of 23
Constructivist learning theories
Constructivist epistemology for the construction of new knowledge
Aristotelian versus Galilean epistemology in constructivist learning theories
Implementing conceptual modeling for learning to conduct scientific research
16 Page 16 of 23
Roles for philosophers of science in educational practices
Concluding remarks
16 Page 20 of 23
16 Page 22 of 23
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.