Abstract
There are philosophical arguments to the effect that the epistemic consequences of religious plurality threaten the epistemic status of religious beliefs. What is not clear is the sense in which they might do so: what epistemological categories are at issue? This chapter uses William Alston’s epistemic-desiderata approach as a guide to the different epistemic values that can be affected by religious plurality. The author argues that in none of Alston’s five categories does religious plurality destroy the positive epistemic status of religious belief, though it can make the realization of many desiderata much more difficult. The chapter concludes with three methodological remarks. First: The situation of religious plurality favours some epistemological positions over others. Second: The philosophy of religion should not ignore individual religious traditions and particular religious doctrines. Third: Religious plurality reminds us that real religions are much more complicated and intricate phenomena than analytic philosophers often admit.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.