Abstract

Branches and boles of trees in wet forests are often carpeted with lichens and bryophytes capable of providing periodically saturated habitat suitable for microfauna, animals that include tardigrades, rotifers, nematodes, mites, and springtails. Although resident microfauna likely exhibit habitat preferences structured by fine-scale environmental factors, previous studies rarely report associations between microfaunal communities and habitat type (e.g., communities that develop in lichens vs. bryophytes). Microfaunal communities were examined across three types of epiphyte and three sampling heights to capture gradients of microenvironment. Tardigrades, rotifers, and nematodes were significantly more abundant in bryophytes than fruticose lichen or foliose lichen. Eight tardigrade species and four tardigrade taxa were found, representing two classes, three orders, six families, and eight genera. Tardigrade community composition was significantly different between bryophytes, foliose lichen, fruticose lichen, and sampling heights. We show that microenvironmental factors including epiphyte type and sampling height shape microfaunal communities and may mirror the environmental preferences of their epiphyte hosts.

Highlights

  • Tree canopies house a tremendous diversity of life and create horizontal and vertical heterogeneity in forest ecosystems (Nadkarni, 1994; Lowman & Rinkner, 2004)

  • Epiphyte type was significant in explaining differences in nematode (p = 0.03), rotifer (p = 0.01), Table 1 Summary of microfauna density and epiphyte types

  • Overall microfaunal density was highest in bryophytes growing in the low sampling height, suggesting that the consistently humid habitat combined with optimal resource availability is sufficient for microfaunal communities to thrive and epiphyte growth form is relevant to microfaunal communities (Jönsson, 2003)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Tree canopies house a tremendous diversity of life and create horizontal and vertical heterogeneity in forest ecosystems (Nadkarni, 1994; Lowman & Rinkner, 2004). Major forms of life in temperate canopies include mammals, birds, and epiphyte mats. In addition to large organisms, small organisms occupy canopy soil and epiphyte material including the phyla Tardigrada, Rotifera, and Nematoda (collectively microfauna), which are often overlooked in forest ecology and biodiversity studies (Glime, 2013; Voegtlin, 1982; Wilson, 2002). Few ecological studies explore the impact of macro and micro environmental factors impact on microfaunal communities (Guil et al, 2009; Mitchell, Miller & Davis, 2009; Chang et al, 2015; Porazińska et al, 2012; Zawierucha et al, 2015)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call