Abstract

ObjectivesWe aimed to determine if epinephrine played a beneficial role on middle cerebral artery velocity (MCAv) during physiologically stressful stimuli prior to cardiovascular collapse. MCAv was assessed during lower body negative pressure (LBNP) under conditions of a saline or epinephrine infusion. We hypothesized that (1) epinephrine would augment the change in MCAv from baseline to LBNP tolerance, (2), epinephrine would increase MCAv for a given LBNP stimulus, (3) at a given percent of LBNP tolerance epinephrine and saline will be similar and (4) that epinephrine would improve LBNP tolerance.MethodsNine participants (35±9yrs, n=5 male, 4 female) underwent a LBNP protocol to physiological tolerance during two study visits, performed at least two weeks apart, and randomized to saline or epinephrine (dose=0.1μg/kg/min) infusions (peripherally‐ inserted central catheter). Blood pressure (radial artery catheter) and middle cerebral artery velocity (transcranial Doppler) were assessed. MCAv and cerebrovascular conductance index (CvCi) were analyzed during baseline (three minutes), physiological tolerance (one minute), during LBNP at a given stimulus (three minutes; −15, −30, −45 mmHg of LBNP), and during relative percentages of LBNP tolerance [three minutes; 20, 40, 60, and 80% of LBNP tolerance time (s)]. Baseline was defined as measures taken after 15 minutes of saline or epinephrine infusion.ResultsIn both saline and epinephrine conditions, MCAv and CvCi decreased from baseline to tolerance (Saline MCAv: 69.7±7.5 vs 44.9±4.9 cm/s, p<0.05; Epinephrine MCAv: 80.9±5.9 vs 56.5±6.7 cm/s, p<0.05; Saline CvCi: 0.69±0.06 vs 0.58±0.067 cm/s/mmHg, p>0.05; Epinephrine CvCi: 0.80±0.06 vs 0.70±0.078 cm/s/mmHg, p<0.05). Epinephrine augmented MCAv at a given LBNP stimulus from baseline to −15, −30, and −45 mmHg (MCAv: Treatment effect: p<0.05; CvCi: Treatment effect: p=0.05). At a relative percent of LBNP tolerance, epinephrine increased MCAv, but when blood pressure was controlled for with CvCi there was no treatment effect between epinephrine and saline (MCAv: Treatment effect: p<0.05; CvCi: Treatment effect: p>0.05). Time to tolerance was not significantly different between saline and epinephrine conditions (1469±168 vs. 1445±82s, p=0.88).ConclusionsEpinephrine increased MCAv during LBNP. These data suggest that epinephrine plays a beneficial role during stressful physiological stimuli such as hemorrhage in humans by augmenting cerebral blood flow prior to cardiovascular collapse. However, epinephrine did not improve LBNP tolerance.Support or Funding InformationThe United States Department of Defense W81XWH‐13‐2‐0038

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call