Abstract

The medium term outcome (over more than one year) of epileptic prodromal AD (epAD) patients treated with antiseizure medications (ASMs) is unknown in terms of seizure response, treatment tolerability, and cognitive and functional progression. To describe such medium term outcome over a mean of 5.1±2.1 years. We retrospectively compared 19 epAD patients with 16 non-epileptic prodromal AD (nepAD) patients: 1) at baseline for demographics, medical history, cognitive fluctuations (CFs), psychotropic medications, MMSE scores, visually rated hippocampal atrophy, CSF neurodegenerative biomarkers, and standard EEG recordings; 2) during follow-up (FU) for psychotropic medications, MMSE progression, and conversion to dementia. In the epAD group, we analyzed baseline and FU types of seizures as well as each line of ASM with the corresponding efficacy and tolerability. At baseline, the epAD group had more CFs than the nepAD group (58% versus 20%, p = 0.03); focal impaired awareness seizures were the most common type (n = 12, 63.1%), occurring at a monthly to quarterly frequency (89.5%), and were well controlled with monotherapy in 89.5% of cases (including 63.1% seizure-free individuals). During FU, treated epAD patients did not differ significantly from nepAD patients in MMSE progression or in conversion to dementia. Epilepsy is commonly controlled with ASMs over the medium term in epAD patients, with similar functional and cognitive outcomes to nepAD patients. Pathophysiologically, epilepsy is likely to be an ASM-modifiable cognitive aggravating factor at this stage of AD.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.