Abstract

Lymphatic and blood vascular endothelial cells (ECs) share several molecular and developmental features. However, these two cell types possess distinct phenotypic signatures, reflecting their different biological functions. Despite significant advances in elucidating how the specification of lymphatic and blood vascular ECs is regulated at the transcriptional level during development, the key molecular mechanisms governing their lineage identity under physiological or pathological conditions remain poorly understood. To explore the epigenomic signatures in the maintenance of EC lineage specificity, we compared the transcriptomic landscapes, histone composition (H3K4me3 and H3K27me3) and DNA methylomes of cultured matched human primary dermal lymphatic and blood vascular ECs. Our findings reveal that blood vascular lineage genes manifest a more ‘repressed’ histone composition in lymphatic ECs, whereas DNA methylation at promoters is less linked to the differential transcriptomes of lymphatic versus blood vascular ECs. Meta-analyses identified two transcriptional regulators, BCL6 and MEF2C, which potentially govern endothelial lineage specificity. Notably, the blood vascular endothelial lineage markers CD34, ESAM and FLT1 and the lymphatic endothelial lineage markers PROX1, PDPN and FLT4 exhibited highly differential epigenetic profiles and responded in distinct manners to epigenetic drug treatments. The perturbation of histone and DNA methylation selectively promoted the expression of blood vascular endothelial markers in lymphatic endothelial cells, but not vice versa. Overall, our study reveals that the fine regulation of lymphatic and blood vascular endothelial transcriptomes is maintained via several epigenetic mechanisms, which are crucial to the maintenance of endothelial cell identity.

Highlights

  • The lymphatic and the blood vasculature exert complementary functions in humans

  • Distinct transcriptomic patterns of lymphatic and blood vascular endothelial cells We and others have previously reported that blood vascular ECs (BECs) and lymphatic ECs (LECs) are characterized by distinct expression patterns of lineagespecific markers [18, 19]

  • Only LECs exhibited a strong positivity for PDPN, while BECs were completely negative for this lymphatic marker (Fig. S1a)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

During early mammalian embryonic development, endothelial progenitors differentiate from the mesodermal tissue to form a primitive vascular system This ancestral vascular plexus undergoes remodeling, resulting in endothelial sprouting (angiogenesis) and specification into arterial or venous cell fates. ECs retain, at least experimentally to some extent, the capacity to transdifferentiate into the alternate endothelial lineage, by repression of genes that determine the pre-existing cell fate and/or by activating the opposing markers [9]. Such endothelial plasticity has been observed under pathological conditions in vivo [10]. The mechanisms maintaining EC lineage specificity during postnatal life are still not fully understood

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call