Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) often results in life-long sensorimotor impairment. Spontaneous recovery from SCI is limited, as supraspinal fibers cannot spontaneously regenerate to form functional networks below the level of injury. Despite this, animal models and humans exhibit many motor behaviors indicative of recovery when electrical stimulation is applied epidurally to the dorsal aspect of the lumbar spinal cord. In 1976, epidural stimulation was introduced to alleviate spasticity in Multiple Sclerosis. Since then, epidural electrical stimulation (EES) has been demonstrated to improve voluntary mobility across the knee and/or ankle in several SCI patients, highlighting its utility in enhancing motor activation. The mechanisms that EES induces to drive these improvements in sensorimotor function remain largely unknown. In this review, we discuss several sensorimotor plasticity mechanisms that we hypothesize may enable epidural stimulation to promote recovery, including changes in local lumbar circuitry, propriospinal interneurons, and the internal model. Finally, we discuss genetic tools for afferent modulation as an emerging method to facilitate the search for the mechanisms of action.

Highlights

  • Spinal cord injury (SCI) often results in life-long sensorimotor dysfunction

  • We refer to the entirety of this endogenous system as the descending supraspinal control, and we propose that it is a contributory mechanism involved in recovery from SCI both with and without spinal cord stimulation

  • This review identifies several plasticity mechanisms that may be evoked by electrical stimulation (EES) through the activation of peripheral afferents

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Spinal cord injury (SCI) often results in life-long sensorimotor dysfunction. Regeneration within the adult spinal cord is limited, some spontaneous or activity-dependent sensorimotor recovery still occurs, mostly mediated by localized sprouting and plasticity of axon terminals (Waters et al, 1996; Burns et al, 1997). Substantial recovery after trauma is challenging because of the poor ability of supraspinal axons to regenerate and form functional networks below the level of injury. The loss of these vital inputs reduces the generation, regulation, and patterning of motor outputs. Improvements in motor function can be achieved with locomotor training, rehabilitation, and/or increased neuronal activity

Mechanisms of Plasticity Underlying EES
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.