Epidemiology of Irritable Hip in Western Scotland: A Follow-Up Study.

Abstract

BackgroundA ‘limping child’ commonly presents to the emergency department (ED). In the absence of trauma, many are diagnosed with irritable hip (IH). The aetiology of IH is not well understood and there may be geographical and seasonal variations. We previously established one year (2016) epidemiological data of IH presenting to the Royal Hospital for Children (RHCG) ED in Glasgow, Scotland. The sentinel findings in that year were (i) an age distribution shift to younger (peak at two years of age), (ii) no marked association with social class, and (iii) a spring preponderance. We sought to strengthen or refute these findings by repeating our study to obtain comparative data for 2017.MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of all children discharged from the RHCG ED from January to December 2017. Relevant discharge codes were determined, and patient records screened. Patients without a discharge code had their presenting complaint and medical record screened. These data were compared to that of the previously published study from the same ED (2016).ResultsSeveral findings were consistent with the conclusions of the 2016 study. The incidence was similar with 362 and 354 cases diagnosed in 2017 and 2016 respectively. The boy-girl ratio was consistent across both data-sets, 2:1 and 1.9:1 respectively. The mean age of presentation was similar (3.3 vs 3.5 years) across both years, with the same medians (three years) and peaks (two years). There was no overt difference in incidence or correlation to social deprivation. However, in 2016, a spring preponderance was seen whereas there was an autumn preponderance in 2017. Pooling data from the two cohorts, 93% (n=668) of patients were managed exclusively by ED physicians, with 70% (n=504) not requiring any further follow-up. The majority of patients who required follow-up were seen in ED clinics (169/212, 79.7%). No patient initially diagnosed as IH was found to have septic arthritis (SA).ConclusionIn this follow-up study, we again found (i) a younger age profile than other studies, and (ii) no overt association with social deprivation. The major difference between the previous (2016) and current (2017) study was the apparent seasonal peaks: spring (2016), and autumn (2017). This difference does not negate the 'antecedent infection' hypothesis, but any aetiological proposal should be capable of accounting for this discrepancy. Additionally, our studies highlight that the majority of these patients can be managed in the ED alone.