Abstract

Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused unprecedented global morbidity and mortality. Japan has faced three epidemic “waves” of COVID-19 from early 2020 through early 2021. Here we narratively review the three waves in Japan, describe the key epidemiologic features of COVID-19, and discuss lessons learned. Methods: We assessed publicly available surveillance data, routine surveillance reports, and other relevant sources―multiple indicators were monitored to improve interpretation of surveillance data. Weekly trends for each wave were described based on the number of case notifications; number of tests performed; proportion of those tests that were positive for the novel coronavirus; the prevalent number of COVID-19 hospitalizations (total hospitalizations and those categorized as severe); and number of COVID-19 deaths. For each indicator and wave, we recorded the first calendar week to show an increase over two consecutive previous weeks, along with the peak week. Results: The spring wave was characterized by detection of cases imported from China, followed by notifications of sporadic cases without travel history, clusters, and mild/asymptomatic cases. The summer wave saw a large increase in notifications and a younger age distribution, but in the context of increased testing with lower test positivity. The winter wave brought considerable morbidity and mortality, surpassing the cumulative case counts and fatalities from the earlier waves, with high peak values. Overall, relative to the first wave, the burden of severe outcomes was lower in the second and higher in the third wave, but varied by prefecture. In all three waves, severe outcomes peaked after notification counts and test positivity peaked; severe outcomes were also consistently skewed toward the elderly. Conclusions: Important lessons were learned from each wave and across waves―some aspects remained constant, while others changed over time. In order to rapidly detect an increase in incidence, continuous, timely, and sensitive surveillance―using multiple information sources with careful interpretations―will be key in COVID-19 control.

Highlights

  • After the Infectious Diseases Control Law was established in September 1998 and took effect in April 1999, the Program was positioned as a statutory initiative

  • The Central Infectious Disease Surveillance Center is established within the Infectious Disease Surveillance Center (IDSC) of the National Institute of Infectious Diseases (NIID), and plays an essential role in collecting and analyzing patient information, suspected case information, and pathogen information reported from local governments, and in promptly providing and disclosing the resultant information to local governments as national information

  • The flow is the same for notifiable diseases, and for sentinel-based diseases, where a Public Health Center (PHC) enters information reported from a sentinel site into National Epidemiological Surveillance of Infectious Diseases (NESID), and a local IDSC undertakes reporting to the national government

Read more

Summary

Infectious Disease Surveillance System in Japan

In the National Epidemiological Surveillance of Infectious Diseases (NESID) Program, information concerning infectious diseases in Japan is collected and published, and occurrence and trends are assessed, based on reporting from physicians and veterinarians. A local IDSC is established in each local government (within the Public Health Institute (PHI), in principle), for the purposes of collecting and analyzing patient information, suspected case information, and pathogen information (including laboratory information; the same applies hereinafter) within the jurisdiction area of the local government, and of reporting such information to the head office of the local government, while promptly providing and disclosing such information, together with national information, to medical associations and other related organizations. Daily meetings are held at IDSC, where disease information reported through NESID is shared, and inquiry is made with the reporting municipality when necessary, contributing to quality control (Figure 2)

Exclusion Deletion
Category V infectious diseases
Request for restraint from outings
Applicable infectious diseases and remarks
Number of sentinel sites
Findings
Feedback of results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call