Abstract
We used two PCR methods for epidemiological typing of Stenotrophomonas (Xanthomonas) maltophilia with either arbitrary primers (random amplified polymorphic DNA) or enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus sequences as primers (ERIC-PCR). The analysis was performed with 38 isolates of S. maltophilia, comprising 9 nosocomial isolates from a burn unit, 20 other clinical isolates epidemiologically unrelated, and 9 isolates from one cystic fibrosis patient. Both methods indicated that all of the nosocomial episodes were independent. In contrast, the nine isolates from the cystic fibrosis patient were assigned to very closely related profiles, especially by ERIC-PCR. We conclude that random amplified polymorphic DNA and ERIC-PCR have comparable reproducible and discriminatory powers for epidemiological typing of S. maltophilia, but ERIC-PCR profiles can be more easily evaluated.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.