Abstract
The contact structure between hosts shapes disease spread. Most network-based models used in epidemiology tend to ignore heterogeneity in the weighting of contacts between two individuals. However, this assumption is known to be at odds with the data for many networks (e.g. sexual contact networks) and to have a critical influence on epidemics' behavior. One of the reasons why models usually ignore heterogeneity in transmission is that we currently lack tools to analyze weighted networks, such that most studies rely on numerical simulations. Here, we present a novel framework to estimate key epidemiological variables, such as the rate of early epidemic expansion () and the basic reproductive ratio (), from joint probability distributions of number of partners (contacts) and number of interaction events through which contacts are weighted. These distributions are much easier to infer than the exact shape of the network, which makes the approach widely applicable. The framework also allows for a derivation of the full time course of epidemic prevalence and contact behaviour, which we validate with numerical simulations on networks. Overall, incorporating more realistic contact networks into epidemiological models can improve our understanding of the emergence and spread of infectious diseases.
Highlights
Contact structure between hosts is known to have a key influence on disease spread [1]
Contact networks are widely used because they possess several convenient properties, one of which being that the dominant eigenvalue of the adjacency matrix is an indicator of the initial propagation speed of an infectious disease spreading on this network [3,4]
Most studies assume that all types of contacts are identical, when in reality some individuals interact more strongly than others
Summary
Contact structure between hosts is known to have a key influence on disease spread [1]. The number of secondary infections generated by a typical infected host in a fully susceptible population, i.e. the basic reproductive number R0 [1], scales with the ratio of the second moment Sk2T and first moment (mean) SkT of the distribution in the number of contacts k. This result holds both for static networks (denoted Rs0tat) [5] as well as for fully mixed, dynamic networks (denoted Rm0 ix) [6,7] with
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.