Abstract
BackgroundThe sudden outbreak of the epidemic has had a significant impact on society and people's daily life. Epidemic prevention and control has become one of the focuses of attention of all countries. What is worth studying is how and why the epidemic has developed so violently. Therefore, this paper proposes an epidemic evolutionary game model between non anxiety sensitive intervention and undifferentiated population and government disease control units.Course and MethodApplication of differential equation and complex network modeling. According to the actual situation, the game matrix is constructed, and the replication factor dynamic equation of the game matrix is analyzed. Then, based on the game matrix and complex network evolution model, the network evolution model is designed for comparative analysis and scenario simulation. Finally, the sensitivity analysis and parameter adjustment are discussed. Parameter values refer to the assumptions and preconditions of the game. In order to better measure the relationship between residents' well-being and situational simulation, this study adopts the emotional regulation strategy questionnaire prepared by gross and John, including two dimensions of expression inhibition and cognitive reappraisal, with a total of 10 questions (4 questions of expression inhibition and 6 questions of cognitive reappraisal). The questionnaire adopts seven points scoring. The composite reliability of the expression inhibition dimension in this measurement is 0.83, the 95% confidence interval estimated by delta method is [0.81, 0.85], and the composite reliability of cognitive reappraisal dimension is 0.83, and the 95% confidence interval is [0.81, 0.85].ResultsThe final strategy of evolutionary stability was calculated as “initiative and indulgence”, that is, the number of active individuals reached a certain value or the social and economic cost was low, or as “mobility, prevention and control”, that is, the government unit had strong control ability and could control the epidemic within a certain range. Then, the negative impact of complex networks and the necessity of prevention and control are obtained through simulation, and the positive impact of fixed cost investment on epidemic prevention and control is explained in detail. The evolutionary stability strategy of replicating dynamic equations is obviously inconsistent with the evolutionary game results of complex networks. The result of evolutionary game in complex networks is not absolutely stable. Obviously, the simulation results are closer to reality. The regression coefficients of the first and second steps are significant. In the third step, after the re-evaluation of intermediary variables is inserted, the impact of social support on adolescents' anxiety level is still significant. Therefore, it can be seen that the re-evaluation plays a partial intermediary role in the relationship between social support and adolescents' anxiety level, and its effect value is 0.07, accounting for 0.05-0.22 / - 0.05 = 22% of the total effect. Taking the level of adolescent anxiety as the dependent variable, social support as the independent variable and re-evaluation as the intermediary variable, the intermediary effect analysis was carried out. The bootstrap self sampling number was 5000. The results show that the 95% confidence interval of the re-evaluated mediating effect is [- 0.376, - 0.058], and 0 is not within the upper and lower limits, indicating that the anxiety level of online game plays a mediating role.Conclusionthe model provides a reference for improving the effect of epidemic prevention and control. This study uses evolutionary game model to analyze the game relationship between population and government departments during the epidemic. The model combines the complex network with the epidemic evolutionary game, and considers the individual's strategy choice in the evolutionary process. The study found that whether individuals are infected is closely related to their choice of consciousness or mobility strategies. However, the susceptibility, infection, recovery or death (SIR) chamber model proposed in 1926 divided the population into three groups. Our proposed model ignores this difference. In evolutionary game, people are regarded as a whole. But in fact, they will make different decisions in different states. The follow-up research will be further improved. In short, we should fully consider the important impact of design factors on emotional popularity factors, actively pay attention to the changes of their psychological emotions and behaviors and their impact on proactive behavior, and strive to adjust builders, managers, coordinators and collaborators. We should actively organize rich activities, flexibly according to the psychological characteristics of this part of the group, strive to create a relaxed and harmonious living atmosphere, create a friendly and mutual assistance relationship, encourage and guide this part, adjust our psychology to the best state, and promote the healthy development of their good cognition and life.AcknowledgementsSupported by a project grant from the 2018 National Social Science Fund: Research on the Evolution Mechanism of Sudden Infectious Diseases and Coordinated Prevention and Control Measures amid Complex Social Networks (Grant No. 18BGL229).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.