Abstract

BackgroundIndependent verification of the dose delivered by complex radiotherapy can be performed by electronic portal imaging device (EPID) dosimetry. This paper presents 5‐yr EPID in vivo dosimetry (IVD) data obtained using the Dosimetry Check (DC) software on a large cohort including breast, lung, prostate, and head and neck (H&N) cancer patients.Material and MethodsThe difference between in vivo dose measurements obtained by DC and point doses calculated by the Eclipse treatment planning system was obtained on 3795 radiotherapy patients treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) (n = 842) and three‐dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) (n = 2953) at 6, 10, and 15 MV. In cases where the dose difference exceeded ±10% further inspection and additional phantom measurements were performed.ResultsThe mean and standard deviation (μ±σ) of the percentage difference in dose obtained by DC and calculated by Eclipse in VMAT was: 0.19±3.89% in brain, 1.54±4.87% in H&N, and 1.23±4.61% in prostate cancer. In 3DCRT, this was 1.79±3.51% in brain, −2.95±5.67% in breast, −1.43±4.38% in bladder, 1.66±4.77% in H&N, 2.60 ± 5.35% in lung and −3.62±4.00% in prostate cancer. A total of 153 plans exceeded the ±10% alert criteria, which included: 88 breast plans accounting for 7.9% of all breast treatments; 28 H&N plans accounting for 4.4% of all H&N treatments; and 12 prostate plans accounting for 3.5% of all prostate treatments. All deviations were found to be as a result of patient‐related anatomical deviations and not from procedural errors.ConclusionsThis preliminary data shows that EPID‐based IVD with DC may not only be useful in detecting errors but has the potential to be used to establish site‐specific dose action levels. The approach is straightforward and has been implemented as a radiographer‐led service with no disruption to the patient and no impact on treatment time.

Highlights

  • It is recommended that all radiotherapy centers in the United Kingdom have a protocol for accurately measuring the dose delivered to a patient during a course of radiotherapy and comparing this to the planned dose.[1,2,3,4] This approach, commonly known as transit or in vivo dosimetry (IVD), has its origins in the 1980s and 1990s when radiographic and radiochromic films were used for this purpose

  • In the first a portal dose image is predicted from the treatment plan and the computerized tomography (CT) images used for planning, which is compared to the measured portal dose image

  • The electronic portal imaging device (EPID) images acquired over the range of depths and field sizes previously defined were converted into relative monitor unit (RMU) using an in‐built conversion function within Dosimetry Check (DC)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It is recommended that all radiotherapy centers in the United Kingdom have a protocol for accurately measuring the dose delivered to a patient during a course of radiotherapy and comparing this to the planned dose.[1,2,3,4] This approach, commonly known as transit or IVD, has its origins in the 1980s and 1990s when radiographic and radiochromic films were used for this purpose. This paper presents 5‐yr EPID in vivo dosimetry (IVD) data obtained using the Dosimetry Check (DC) software on a large cohort including breast, lung, prostate, and head and neck (H&N) cancer patients. Material and Methods: The difference between in vivo dose measurements obtained by DC and point doses calculated by the Eclipse treatment planning system was obtained on 3795 radiotherapy patients treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) (n = 842) and three‐dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) (n = 2953) at 6, 10, and 15 MV. Results: The mean and standard deviation ðl Æ rÞ of the percentage difference in dose obtained by DC and calculated by Eclipse in VMAT was: 0:19 Æ 3:89% in brain, 1:54 Æ 4:87% in H&N, and 1:23 Æ 4:61% in prostate cancer. The approach is straightforward and has been implemented as a radiographer‐led service with no disruption to the patient and no impact on treatment time

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.