Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Glioma incidence is 25% lower in U.S. Hispanics than in White non-Hispanics. The US Hispanic population is diverse and registry-based analyses may mask incidence differences associated with geographic/ancestral origins. METHODS County-level glioma incidence data in U.S. Hispanics were retrieved from the Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States (CBTRUS), which includes data from the Centers for Disease Control’s National Program of Cancer Registries and the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program and covers ~100% of the U.S. population. American Community Survey (ACS) data were used to determine county-level proportion of the Hispanic population of Mexican/Central American origin, Caribbean origin (Puerto Rican, Cuban, Dominican), or other origin. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were generated to assess the association of glioma incidence in Hispanics with predominant origin group. RESULTS Compared to Hispanics living in predominantly Caribbean-origin counties, Hispanics in predominantly Mexican/Central American-origin counties were at lower age-adjusted risk of glioma (IRR=0.83; P< 0.0001), glioblastoma (IRR=0.86; P< 0.0001), diffuse and anaplastic astrocytoma (IRR=0.78; P< 0.0001), oligodendroglioma (IRR=0.82; P< 0.0001), ependymoma (IRR=0.88; P=0.0121), and pilocytic astrocytoma (IRR=0.76; P< 0.0001). Associations were consistent in children and adults, and when using more granular regions of origin. However, Central American origin was associated with modestly increased incidence of several lower-grade glioma histologies. Associations were only partially attenuated after adjusting for state-level estimated of European admixture in Hispanics using 23andMe data. CONCLUSIONS Glioma incidence in U.S. Hispanics differs significantly in association with the geographic origins of the Hispanic community, with those of Mexican/Central American origin at significantly reduced risk relative to those of Caribbean origin. U.S. Hispanics are culturally, socioeconomically, and genetically diverse. Although classified as a single ethnic group in most registry data, more granular analytic approaches could advance cancer epidemiology and disparities research.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call