Abstract
Epicurean physics is fundamentally atomist. This means that it rests on two principal theses. The first is: 'All bodies are either indivisible small bodies or else are composed of indivisible small bodies.' The Greek adjective 'atomos' means 'indivisible, what cannot be divided'. When made into a noun, or when a noun is understood, usually it is translated as 'atom' or 'atoms'. Let us call this thesis the 'Atomist Thesis'. Epicurus sets it out in a canonical form at the beginning of his inquiry into physics at Letter to Herodotus 40: 'Amongst bodies, some are composites (sunkriseis); others are those from which the composites are made. These latter are indivisible (atoma) and unalterable ' Lucretius reprises the argument in the first book of the De rerum natura (DRN), calling the atoms 'principles' (principia) or 'the first elements of things' (primordia rerum). The 'composites' are rendered as concilia. It appears that Epicurus used this argument on various occasions, at least if we believe the scholion which accompanies this passage in the Letter to Herodotus: 'He also says this in the first book of On Nature and in books XIV and XV, as well as in the Great Epitome'.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
