Epicardial catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients of acm - from a university hospital report in switzerland

Abstract

Abstract Background Arrhythmogenic left ventricular cardiomyopathy (ALVC) as a subtype of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is increasingly being recognized. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has emerged as the primary imaging modality for the diagnosis of ACM. In patients with right-dominant ACM (ARVC) and recurrent sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT), endocardial +/-epicardial ablation yields good clinical outcomes in the long-term. However, studies on VT ablation in ACM with LV involvement are scarce. Purpose We sought to investigate clinical outcomes of VT ablation in ACM patients with LV involvement. Methods The study included patients from the Zurich ACM Registry who met 2020 "Padua Criteria" for ACM and underwent VT ablation between January 2018 and July 2023. Epicardial ablation was performed in patients with recurrent sustained VT despite endocardial ablation, those lacking and endocardial substrate or if the ECG of the VT / substrate on CMR was suggestive of an epicardial origin. Catheter ablation was guided by activation/entrainment mapping for mappable VT, and pace mapping/voltage mapping during sinus rhythm for unmappable VT. Consecutive follow-up of all patients was performed according to our protocol. Results Twenty-one ACM patients underwent n=24 VT ablation procedures. Of those 20 patients, 6 patients (30%) had LV involvement on CMR. Eight (33%) patients underwent epicardial +/- endocardial ablation. Among patients receiving epicardial ablation, 3 patients (38%) had LV involvement. These three underwent a single ablation procedure, which was epicardial only. Total follow-up was 30 months (range 4-43). Three-month sustained VT/VF recurrence rates were 12% in the ACM group with LV involvement vs 25% in ACM without LV involvement. All patients with sustained VT/VF recurrence underwent repeat ablation via an epicardial approach within 3 months and were free of sustained VT/VF thereafter during a median follow-up of 12 months. One-year recurrence rate did not differ between ACM patients with LV involvement vs. without LV involvement (7.7% vs 8.3%, P＝0.117). Seven out of eight epicardial ablations achieved freedom from VT/VF after one-year follow-up. One ARVC patient with previous endocardial ablation had recurrent VT one month after epicardial ablation, which was free of VT after Flecainide combined with beta-blocker. No significant differences were found in the use of beta-blockers and antiarrhythmic drugs between both groups (ACM with LV involvement vs. without LV involvement) at baseline and during one-year follow-up. Conclusions Single or adjuvant epicardial substrate ablation of VT in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy is promising in terms of postprocedural VT free survival, especially in patients with left ventricular involvement demonstrated by CMR.Figure 1Figure 2