EP.WE.372Has COVID-19 affected the attention surgical papers are receiving?

Abstract

Abstract Aim Unsurprisingly, much of the medical profession has focussed on treating covid-19 over the past year often to the detriment of other pathologies. Engagement with academic literature may follow a similar trend; this paper used standard social media attention and citations metrices to assess whether the pandemic has affected engagement with surgical literature. Method Twitter Mentions and Mendeley Readers Data were retrieved for all papers published in Annals of Surgery, BJS and JAMASurgery between January 2019 and October 2020. The non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare Twitter Mentions and Mendeley Readers for COVID surgical vs non-COVID surgical publications (in 2020) and all surgical papers published before and after the advent of COVID-19. A control database of all papers published in NEJM, BMJ and Lancet over the same period of time was also created. Results There was no difference in Twitter mentions between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 papers (p-value 0.604); however there were significantly more Mendeley readers of COVID-19 papers than non-COVID-19 papers in 2020 (55 vs 5 median readers, p < 0.001). Surgical papers published in 2020 received significantly fewer Twitter mentions than those published in 2019 (15.5 vs 27, p < 0.001). Analysis of the non-surgical control dataset revealed the opposite trend; papers published in 2020 received significantly more attention than those published in 2019 (39 vs 30 median Twitter citations, p < 0.001). Conclusion Surgical papers published during the COVID-19 pandemic received significantly fewer social media mentions. Such reduced visibility has the potential to affect future citation metrics and dissemination of surgical knowledge