EP.FRI.886 Clinicians’ compliance and diagnostic utility of digital rectal examination in acute abdominal emergencies: a prospective, blinded study

Abstract

Abstract Aims One hundred years ago, Sir Zachary Cope described digital rectal examination (DRE) as ‘extremely important and informative’ in the assessment of the acute abdomen. Medical students have always been taught of the importance of including a DRE as part of the abdominal examination. It has however been observed that DRE is often omitted in clinical practice. The aims of the study are to determine how frequently DRE is carried out in acute abdominal emergencies and also to determine the diagnostic utility of DRE in this setting. Methods Patients over the age of 18 presenting to the on-call general surgeons in a teaching general hospital with any acute abdominal symptoms over a 15 day period were assessed prospectively. The performance of a DRE by any clinician at any point up to 24 hours post-admission was recorded, and the findings of DRE were analysed with respect to the final diagnosis. Results Out of the 168 patients presenting with an abdominal emergency, 41 (24.4%) had a rectal examination. 70.7% of DRE were done by surgical trainees and foundation doctors. Most DREs were performed when the presenting complaints were constipation, rectal bleeding, and suprapubic pain. The findings on DRE directly contributed to the final diagnosis in 11 patients. Conclusions DRE is only preformed selectively during the initial evaluation of surgical patients presenting with acute abdominal symptoms. However DRE remains a key part of clinical examination. The theoretical and practical skills in the performance of DRE should be safeguarded via continuing education and training.