Abstract

BackgroundThe role of eosinophils in cancer is not yet completely understood, but patients with eosinophilia show a trend towards longer survival in several types of cancer, including melanoma. However, eosinophil count at initial diagnosis of metastatic melanoma does not predict survival. Since eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) mediates anticancer effects, such as tissue remodelling and cytotoxic activity, we investigated this marker as an early prognostic marker in metastatic melanoma.MethodsSerum of 56 melanoma patients was collected at the time of diagnosis of metastatic disease. ECP levels as measured by ELISA were correlated with overall survival (OS) in patients before systemic therapy with immunotherapy or chemotherapy. Statistical analyses were performed using the Log–Rank (Mantel–Cox) test.ResultsThe median OS for patients with high serum ECP above 12.2 ng/ml was 12 months (n = 39), compared to 28 months for patients with ECP below this threshold (n = 17; p = 0.0642). In patients with cutaneous melanoma, excluding patients with uveal and mucosal melanoma, the survival difference was even more striking (p = 0.0393). ECP’s effect size on OS was observed independently of the consecutive therapy. ECP levels were not correlated with LDH levels.ConclusionECP seems to be a novel prognostic serum marker for the outcome of melanoma patients, which is independent of LDH and easy to perform in clinical practice. The striking negative prognostic value of high ECP level is unanticipated and can guide patient management.

Highlights

  • The role of eosinophils in cancer is not yet completely understood, but patients with eosinophilia show a trend towards longer survival in several types of cancer, including melanoma

  • Patients with low eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) at initial diagnosis of metastatic disease had a longer survival in comparison with patients with high ECP

  • This study suggests that ECP represents an independent novel prognostic biomarker in patients with metastatic melanoma

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The role of eosinophils in cancer is not yet completely understood, but patients with eosinophilia show a trend towards longer survival in several types of cancer, including melanoma. Eosinophil count at initial diagnosis of metastatic melanoma does not predict survival. Eosinophil count has already been shown to be a predictive biomarker for therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors in melanoma [14]. Baseline frequencies as well as an increase of the number of eosinophils between the first and the second infusion of the anti-CTLA-4 antibody ipilimumab correlate with a better overall survival (OS) [14,15,16]. Regarding therapy with anti-PD-1 antibodies, eosinophil count at baseline correlated with OS of melanoma patients [14, 17]. In Krückel et al BMC Cancer (2019) 19:207 most cases patients only developed eosinophilia during the course of metastatic disease, eosinophil count at initial diagnosis of metastatic disease did not predict survival [9, 18]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call