Enzyme immunoassay, complement fixation and hemagglutination inhibition tests in the diagnosis of influenza A and B virus infections. Purified hemagglutinin in subtype-specific diagnosis

Abstract

The efficacy of enzyme immunoassay (EIA) in detecting diagnostic antibody rises to influenza A and B viruses was compared with complement fixation (CF) and hemagglutination inhibition (HI) tests in 455 patients with an acute respiratory infection. EIA and HI detected significantly more diagnostic antibody rises against influenza A than the CF method (96 and 87 vs. 47, respectively). In the case of influenza B significantly more diagnostic influenza B antibody rises were observed by EIA than by CF or HI (59 vs. 37 and 40, respectively). In most of the cases antibody rises in EIA were found in both IgG and IgA isotypes whereas increases in IgM antibodies were seen less frequently. Purified hemagglutinins (HA) were prepared from influenza A HI- and H3-subtypes and from influenza B viruses and used as antigens in EIA and the results were compared with those of HI. Infections caused by influenza A HI-subtype showed good homologous antibody responses in EIA but heterologous antibody responses to H3-subtype and influenza B HAs were frequently observed. Heterologous responses were clearly less frequent in patients with infections caused by the H3-subtype. Influenza B infections occasionally raised HA antibodies against influenza A H1-subtype but not to the H3-subtype. Interestingly, HI detected these heterologous responses at least as frequently as EIA. When whole viruses were used as antigens in EIA, subtype specificity was not observed and cross-reactions between influenza A and B virus antibodies were found. These observations suggest that, although EIA can show greater diagnostic efficacy over HI and CF methods, HI is still the serological method of choice in determining the causative subtype of influenza A virus infection.