Abstract

IntroductionIn the European Union companies only need to demonstrate that the risk-benefit balance of the new drug is favourable to obtain the authorization to sell new drugs. Hence a comparison with available treatments, a cost-effectiveness analysis and the place in the therapy of the new drug are not required. Therefore, it is necessary to carry out these analyses in an additional study. In Spain there is no national government agency, which conducts a centralized evaluation and makes decisions on funding and are the Pharmacy and Therapeutics committees that take mandatory decisions for the entire region. ObjectivesTo identify all drug assessments and health technology assessment reports of the enzymatic replacement treatments for the four LSD considered in this study, including Mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS), Gaucher, Fabry and Pompe disease at the national, regional and hospital level; and to summarize the efficacy in terms of outcome measures, adverse events, economic impact and final recommendations and indicate potential improvements. Methods19 reviews at the regional and hospital level and one therapeutic positioning report at national level for MPS were considered for this. ResultsIn general, the drugs evaluated in LSD have proved to be effective in the most frequent clinical forms of disease. However, there are clinical phenotypes that still do not have available an effective treatment. ConclusionsIt is expected that new therapies, such as intrathecal therapies or gene therapy could be evaluated in the different types of LSD demonstrating positive effects, especially in the previous phenotypes.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call